Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Harris v. United States
as 5:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Bobby Leon Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights
Starks v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Franklin Leon Starks
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Harris v. United States
as 5:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Bobby Leon Harris and Bobby Leon Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights
Sharpe v. Spark et al
as 7:2023cv01348
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Sharpe
Defendant:
Peter J. Spark, Mark Leon Eastham and Daniel Matthew Shoaf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Harris v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Leonard N. Harris and Leon Harris
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
SPEARMAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00561
Plaintiff:
REVEREND DR. T. ANTHONY SPEARMAN
Defendant:
DERRICK JOHNSON, LEON W. RUSSELL, GLORIA J. SWEET-LOVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
SPEARMAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
REVEREND DR. T. ANTHONY SPEARMAN
Defendant:
DERRICK JOHNSON, LEON W. RUSSELL and GLORIA J. SWEET-LOVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
SHANNON v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00952
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, GEORGE SOLOMON, KAREN STEINOUR and others
Plaintiff:
TAMMY SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL et al v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00943
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, GEORGE SOLOMON, ANGELA SINTEF and others
Plaintiff:
DYREL NOWELL, GEORGE MOORE and CLINTON SKINNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHEWSON v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00951
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, GEORGE SOLOMON, ANGELA SINTEF and others
Plaintiff:
GARRISON MATHEWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
