Cases 1 - 10 of 500
HETZ et al v. MENGES et al
as 3:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
BETHANIE HETZ and TRAVIS HETZ
Petitioner:
William T Cline
Defendant:
LORI MENGES and LORI MENGES DAYCARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bowles v. Apollo Freight Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Danny R. Bowles
Defendant:
Apollo Freight Systems, Inc., Theodore Ammons and Lori D. Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roser v. BioTE Medical, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00524
Plaintiff:
Lori Roser
Defendant:
BioTE Medical, LLC and Drs. Krajekian, Brock, Henderson, Di Prisco, & Ravelo, Inc. doing business as The Facial Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., Tyco Fire Products L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Miller, Cynthia Nine, Chandra Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Roser v. Chapman
as 2:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Lori A. Roser
Defendant:
William Jarrod Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferguson v. Barboursville Lodge No. 2586, Loyal Order of Moose, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00761
Plaintiff:
K. Malik Ferguson
Defendant:
Barboursville Lodge No. 2586, Loyal Order of Moose, Inc. and Lori King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pauley et al v. Breinig
as 2:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Adam Breinig
Plaintiff:
Lori Pauley and David Pauley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2018cv00330
Plaintiff:
Lori Thomas
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sacks v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00085
Plaintiff:
Lori Sacks
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Silcox v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv04574
Plaintiff:
Lori J Silcox
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
