Cases 1 - 10 of 14
ARMSTRONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12462
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DEANE ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06151
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DEAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VAUGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04765
Plaintiff:
JAMES VAUGHT, JEREMY JACKSON, LEE ASH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vaught et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Vaught, Jeremy Jackson, Lee Ash and others
Defendant:
3M Company
SILVER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04126
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DEAN SILVER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pinones v. Baldridge et al
as 3:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Salvador Anselmo Pinones, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew Dean Baldridge, Donna M. Baldridge and Does 1 Through 10
Cross Defendant:
Elias Perez and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
WHITFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53091
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DEAN WHITFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv62633
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv23240
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHAUB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv21982
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DEAN SCHAUB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
