Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Medrano-Gonzalez v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02721
Plaintiff:
Raquel Medrano-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medrano v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv16847
Plaintiff:
Linda Ann Medrano
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, American Medical Systems, Inc. , C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medrano v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10003
Plaintiff:
Valerie Medrano
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medrano v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00483
Plaintiff:
Maria Medrano
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medrano v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30660
Plaintiff:
Natalie Medrano
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Segovia et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv18278
Plaintiff:
Ana Segovia and Mario Medrano
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Medrano v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv16752
Plaintiff:
Gail Medrano
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Medrano v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv01525
Plaintiff:
Koleta Medrano
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Medrano et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv00878
Plaintiff:
Maryhellen Medrano and Raul Medrano
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Medrano v. Burks
as 3:2008cv00090
Plaintiff:
Santos Medrano, Santos Medrano and Santos Medrano
Defendant:
Derek R. Burks
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
