Cases 1 - 10 of 20
HOWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28597
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DOE 4 v. BUTLER UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 4
Defendant:
BUTLER UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL HOWELL and RALPH REIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOE 3 v. BUTLER UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 3
Defendant:
BUTLER UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL HOWELL and RALPH REIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOE 2 v. BUTLER UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 2
Defendant:
BUTLER UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL HOWELL and RALPH REIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOE v. BUTLER UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv01302
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, 1
Defendant:
BUTLER UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL HOWELL and RALPH REIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HOWELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MICHAEL HOWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOWELL v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv03509
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOWELL and MICHAEL L. HOWELL
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
HOWELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22879
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOWELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15957
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12048
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
