Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Guerrero v. Murray et al
as 1:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Melida Guerrero
Defendant:
Richard George Murray and Ollie's Bargain Outlet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Murray v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00810
Plaintiff:
Michele C Murray and Michele Murray
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray-Nodine v. Bliven
as 1:2019cv00662
Defendant:
Cracker Barrel and Annette Hupalar
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Jennifer Bliven
Plaintiff:
Theresa Murray-Nodine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murray v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2017cv03127
Plaintiff:
Constance Murray
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. Wexford Health Source, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv02439
Plaintiff:
Chris Murray
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Inc. and Patrick Aihevia, RN, ADON- RCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murray v. Mann
as 1:2015cv01660
Plaintiff:
Tawanda Murray
Defendant:
Vance Deonte Mann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cassidy et al v. Murray
as 1:2014cv01204
Plaintiff:
Susan A. Cassidy , John E. Bronson and Susan A. Cassidy and John E. Bronson
Defendant:
Pamela A. Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McMahon et al v. The Garland Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02739
Plaintiff:
Marybeth McMahon, Christina M. Hare, Janet Johnson and others
Defendant:
The Garland Company, Inc. and Tamko Building Products, Inc.
Intervenor_defendant:
Ron Ruff Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murray v. Southern Maryland Hospital
as 8:2011cv03529
Plaintiff:
Michelle Y. Murray
Defendant:
Southern Maryland Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saravia et al v. Yue et al
as 8:2010cv00832
Plaintiff:
Rhina Saravia , Rosa Maria Gamez and Phillip R. Murray
Defendant:
Chen De Yue and New Century Travel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
