Torts - Injury Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Nobles v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02935
Plaintiff: Chablis M Nobles
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Noble v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00963
Plaintiff: Sandra F Noble
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawson v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00040
Plaintiff: Thomas W. Lawson
Defendant: Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Noble v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02736
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Anna Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noble v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00962
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tracy Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noble v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv04583
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff: Tina Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Board of County Commissioners of Noble County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2020op45129
Defendant: Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Board of County Commissioners of Noble County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Noble v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2020cv00936
Defendant: C R BARD, Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard
Plaintiff: Carolyn Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noble v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00200
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Angela Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOBLE v. THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO et al
as 1:2019cv00987
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER NOBLE
Defendant: THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO, Columbus City Schools, Cynthia Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?