Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Diehl et al v. Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
as 3:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Diehl, Tylor Young, April McElroy and others
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Richard F McDevitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
K.R. v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv02186
Plaintiff:
K. R., LAKESHA MOFFITT and ANDRE ROBINSON
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
R. et al
as 1:2022cv02175
Plaintiff:
K. R., LAKESHA MOFFITT, ANDRE ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
R. et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv02173
Plaintiff:
K. R., LAKESHA MOFFITT and ANDRE ROBINSON
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robinson v. Speedway LLC
as 2:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Deborah Robinson
Defendant:
Speedway LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
ROBINSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv01470
Plaintiff:
ACQUANETTE D. ROBINSON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv00635
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DALE ROBINSON, II
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SHANNON MCVEIGH, ZACHARY POMERANTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
ROBINSON v. AMPT
as 4:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
TYLER ROBINSON
Defendant:
LESTER AMPT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROBINSON v. AMPT
as 1:2021cv02827
Plaintiff:
TYLER ROBINSON
Defendant:
LESTER AMPT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVIS et al v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv02792
Plaintiff:
LARRY DAVIS, RANDY DUNCAN, BRANDON ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
