Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Edward Ameen, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-13547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD AMEEN, RODNEY BAKER, JOSEPH BARTOLO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, APOTEX CORP., MICHAEL MCCANDLESS and others
Philip Krause v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-13283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP KRAUSE, VALENCIA GARRETT, ANA MONDRAGON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, APOTEX CORP., MICHAEL MCCANDLESS and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT and COMMON CAUSE
Not Classified By Court:
ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE
Brian Adams, et al v. 3M Company
as 23-5232
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES, et al.
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Adams et al vs 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00082
Defendant:
Network Supply, 3M Company, American Optical Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Adams, Alice Adams, Edward Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Baker v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 9:2020cv81741
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Amerisource Health Services, LLC, Chattem, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv07551
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mangold et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00073
Plaintiff:
Judith A. Mangold and Fred C. Mangold
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Earl Township, Robert Goodbred and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
