Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Wood et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv05243
Plaintiff:
Tamala Wood and Robert C. Wood, Jr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greene et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02432
Plaintiff:
Vivienne Joan Greene and Robert C. Greene
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Firelli et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02037
Plaintiff:
Frances Firelli and Robert C. Firelli
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schuler et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15379
Plaintiff:
Connie Schuler and Robert C. Schuler
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv13908
Plaintiff:
Rita K. Anderson and Robert C. Anderson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv03334
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Martin
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv30251
Plaintiff:
Michelle Taylor and Robert C. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Billingsley et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv17550
Plaintiff:
Diane Billingsley and Robert C. Reik
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14641
Plaintiff:
Rita R. Anderson and Robert C. Anderson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06752
Plaintiff:
Janella Jean Lewis and Robert C. Lewis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
