Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Paul Roth et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv01186
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Roth and Sushmita Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Ray, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Roth v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv00415
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joan Ann Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Roth et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv00446
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, Dupont De Nemours Inc, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Roth and Richard Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03409
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., UTC FIre & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Flanagan, Mary Martinez, Kelii Apo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roth et al v. United States of America
as 6:2015cv04988
Plaintiff:
Cindy A Roth , Richard D Roth and Jason S Roth
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Roth v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv02747
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Roth
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hollman v. TLC The Laser Eye Center Institute Inc et al
as 6:2010cv00685
Plaintiff:
John Hollman
Defendant:
TLC The Laser Eye Center Institute Inc, TLC The Laser Center Carolina Inc, TLC The Laser Center Madison Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
