Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bogushevich v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00313
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Timothy Roberts
Plaintiff:
Igor Bogushevich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Tedrow v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 6:2018cv01609
Plaintiff:
Joy Tedrow
Defendant:
Arthur Thomas Rambo, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Godwin Chukwuemeka Eze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evenson v. Swift Transportation Company et al
as 3:2017cv01215
Plaintiff:
Darrick Evenson
Defendant:
Swift Leasing Co., LLC, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hughes et al v. Swift Transportation et al
as 2:2017cv00089
Claimant:
Department of Labor & Industries
Defendant:
FedEx Freight Inc., Fedex Shipping Corporation and Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Unknown:
Alfred E. Donohue, Dylan E Jackson and Hanni Pichel
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hughes and Danielle Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Slaven v. Swift Transportation Services, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv01338
Defendant:
John William Siemssen and Swift Transportation Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Crystal Slaven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
House et al v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2011cv00249
Plaintiff:
Brian House and Christen House
Interested Non-Party:
PacificSource Health Plans
Defendant:
Warren Evan Shaffer, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Swift Transportation Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Wise v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv06342
Plaintiff:
Karl Wise and Karl Wise
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co., Inc. and Bruce Mark Pistone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
