Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Mitchell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03448
Plaintiff:
Judy Mitchell and Ted Mitchell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyles v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00959
Plaintiff:
Donna Stillwell Boyles and Ted Lee Boyles
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bussey et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv09060
Plaintiff:
Norma Bussey and Ted Bussey
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv06084
Plaintiff:
Mary White and Ted White
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03104
Plaintiff:
Marlene James and Ted James
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
Pamela Nelson and Ted A. Nelson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fackrell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15287
Plaintiff:
Connie Lou Fackrell and Ted Warren Fackrell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Asay et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13784
Plaintiff:
Merry Ann Asay and Ted Asay
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wylie et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11897
Plaintiff:
Dawn Wylie and Ted Wylie
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brandt et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08704
Plaintiff:
Margaret Brandt and Ted Paolini
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
