Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Vaughn et al v. Kentuckiana Surgical Specialists, P.S.C. et al
as 3:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Linda Vaughn and Douglas Vaughn
Defendant:
Kentuckiana Surgical Specialists, P.S.C., Kevin A. O'Koon, Michael G. Hughes, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Vaughn v. Strunk et al
as 6:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Megan Vaughn
Defendant:
Dustin Strunk and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gloria Ashby et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Gloria Ashby , Oliver Woods Sr , Edna Adams and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown et al v. Skechers U.S.A. et al
as 3:2015cv00472
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Plaintiff:
Corey Brown , Doris Henderson-Lumpkins , Danielle Aultowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vaughn v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 5:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
Judy Vaughn
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vaughn v. Konecranes, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
George Vincent Vaughn
Defendant:
Konecranes, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Konecranes, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Demag Cranes and Compenents Corp and Hetronic USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vaughn v. Target Stores, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00521
Plaintiff:
Joyce Roxanne Vaughn
Defendant:
Target Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jones et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
George Vercher, Cynthia Petrie, Robert Jones and others
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc., Teva Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Vintage Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
