Cases 1 - 7 of 7
HUTCHINSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
ARLENE HUTCHINSON, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM HUTCHINSON and ARLENE HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Ard et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 9:2022cv81390
Plaintiff:
Willie Ard, Oswald Arellano, Kimberly Barnett and others
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim U.S.A. Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Ard et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
Willie Ard, Oswald Arellano, Kimberly Barnett and others
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Pfizer Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Hilton et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02753
Plaintiff:
Samantha Hilton and William Hutchinson
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUTCHINSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv19765
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander et al v. Monaco Coach Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv03426
Plaintiff:
Darius Alexander , Robert Cross, Sr , Carrie Carpenter and others
Defendant:
Monaco Coach Corporation, CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUTCHINSON et al v. A SHORE VIEW CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2009cv04553
Plaintiff:
FRANCES HUTCHINSON and WILLIAM HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
A SHORE VIEW CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, P.-D. MCCANN MANAGEMENT COMPANY, DEBORAH A. MCCANN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
