Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Wooten v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv07018
Plaintiff:
Dartha J. Wooten
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15362
Plaintiff:
Dawn Wooten and Tracy Wooten
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv11181
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Wooten
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02797
Plaintiff:
Crystal Renee Wooten
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02440
Plaintiff:
Dollie Wooten
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv11049
Plaintiff:
Kristi Wooten and Jeffery Davis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv24774
Plaintiff:
Ladora Wooten and Ronald Katona
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv09116
Plaintiff:
Tammy P. Wooten and Edward N. Wooten
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wooten et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02971
Plaintiff:
Sally Jane Wooten and Cereda Lee Wooten
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wooten v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00520
Plaintiff:
Shirley Wooten
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
