Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Williams v. Amazon Studios, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv11739
Defendant:
Yum! Brands, Inc., Viacom Inc., Forty Acres and a Mule and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Williams
**CASE CLOSED - ALL ENTRIES MUST BE MADE IN 18-12719**
as 2:2018cv13165
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Roy Naasz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2018cv12528
Plaintiff:
Bobby Roe, Donald M. Christenson, Jeffery Eidson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Badagliacco v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv12379
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, Ford Motor Company and Robert Bosch LLC
Plaintiff:
Dina M. Badagliacco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Product Liability
Kinnunen v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2017cv11053
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Kinnunen, Roger Kinnunen, John Furno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Rivera v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2016cv13786
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Rivera and Jon Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Automotive Components Holdings, LLC et al v. Konal Engineering and Equipment, Inc.
as 2:2012cv10762
Plaintiff:
Automotive Components Holdings, LLC and Ford Motor Company
Defendant:
Konal Engineering and Equipment, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Festo, Inc., Canadian Bearings Ltd., Rockwell Automation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gordon Granite, Inc v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2011cv14547
Plaintiff:
Gordon Granite, Inc
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Al's Auto Supply, Incorporated et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2011cv12082
Plaintiff:
Al's Auto Supply, Incorporated and Robert Joseph Roseberry
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Clark v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2011cv11850
Plaintiff:
Charles Clark
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
