Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Amorin et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co., LTD. et al
as 2:2011cv00377
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Amorin , Carmen Amorin , Kenneth Abel and others
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd., Taian Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd., Qinhuangdao Taishan Building Materials Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendoza v. Thompson, etc., et al
as 2:2011cv00236
Plaintiff:
Roberto Mendoza
Defendant:
Bruce Thompson , Gold Key Resorts Mortgage Services , Jackie Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barros v. ITT Educational Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00359
Plaintiff:
Gina Barros
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services, Inc., Nancy Cruz, Tatiana Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127
Stryker v. Shopper Discounts et al
as 5:2011cv00009
Defendant:
Does 1-188, Shopper Discounts and Woman Within
Plaintiff:
Danielle M. Stryker
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Najera et al v. World Savings Bank et al
as 1:2009cv01213
Plaintiff:
Daniel Najera and Yessica Pereira
Defendant:
World Savings Bank, Wachovia Bank, NA, Wells Fargo Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Truth and Lending
RPT Consulting, LLC v. Joyner et al
as 2:2008cv00634
Plaintiff:
RPT Consulting, LLC
Defendant:
Matthew D. Joyner, Daniel Defense, Inc., Daniel Defense Armaments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
reVision, Inc. v. Landry et al
as 1:2008cv00592
Plaintiff:
reVision, Inc.
Defendant:
Shawn Landry, QBE3, LLC, QBE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dugan v. CMH Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv00036
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Dugan and Daniel J. Dugan
Defendant:
CMH Manufacturing, Inc., CMH Manufacturing, Inc., CMH Homes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Moody v. Franklin Ford-Mercury, Inc et al
as 7:2007cv00414
Plaintiff:
Jerry Moody
Defendant:
Franklin Ford-Mercury, Inc, Gerald Duncan, Andy Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
