Cases 41 - 50 of 158
Dave et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2022cv07642
Plaintiff:
Prushti Dave, Arlene Bergum, Emily Depol and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Alere, Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jackson-Mau v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2018cv04868
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and International Vitamin Corporation
Plaintiff:
Theda Jackson-Mau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Dave et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 3:2022cv05191
Plaintiff:
Prushti Dave, Arlene Bergum, Emily Depol and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Alere, Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Caneda et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 2:2022cv05435
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Caneda and Natalia La Rosa
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics GmBH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rouffy v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rouffy
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Toporek v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2022cv04766
Plaintiff:
Michael Toporek
Defendant:
Walgreen CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Novotney v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2022cv03439
Plaintiff:
Jim Novotney
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Toporek v. Walgreen Co.
as 2:2022cv02084
Plaintiff:
Michael Toporek
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Price v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2022cv21405
Plaintiff:
Fernanda Price
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Calixte v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2022cv01855
Plaintiff:
Jacques Calixte
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
