Cases 61 - 70 of 326
Hosmer et al v. Esquire Bank NA et al
as 1:2018cv00124
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Esquire Bank NA and Citibank N.A.
Plaintiff:
Art Hosmer and Bert Rosenquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ankur Gida San. Ve Tic. Ltd., STI v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv07168
Defendant:
JPM Chase Bank, N.A., JOHN DOE #"1" through # "10", JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Ankur Gida San Ve Tic. Ltd., TI and Ankur Gida San. Ve Tic. Ltd., STI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Boyd v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2018cv00748
Plaintiff:
John R. Boyd
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dyer v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 5:2018cv00323
Plaintiff:
Neil Dyer
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Erickson v. Confreda, Jr. et al
as 1:2018cv22211
Plaintiff:
Carl Erickson
Defendant:
Ralph W. Confreda, Jr., Terrance W. Anderson, Kenneth Eric Trent and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BULUT v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2018cv09303
Plaintiff:
SARAH A BULUT
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. , VISA, INC. and VISA USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNHAM v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv21548
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D DUNHAM
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Rodney Rutty, WELLS FARGO BANK, ,N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dennis et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 3:2018cv00555
Plaintiff:
Dwayne J. Dennis and Hazel R.D. Dennis
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Symonette et al v. Dade County et al
as 1:2018cv21104
Plaintiff:
Maurice Symonette, Alfred Davis, James Buckman and others
Defendant:
Dade County, Dade County Eviction Sheriffs Dept, Dade County Clerk of Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
