Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MASON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
as 3:2021cv10222
Plaintiff:
DENISE MASON and MADELYN LEVY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. D/B/A OGX BEAUTY and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. doing business as OGX BEAUTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNS et al v. BIO-REFERENCE LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv16533
Defendant:
OPTUM360 SERVICES, INC., LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, BIO-REFERENCE LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
NAOMI SHAPIRO, HANNAH WEISS, VICKI JOHNS and others
In Re:
AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
as 2:2019md02904
Defendant:
OPTUM360, LLC, QUEST DIAGNOSTIC INCORPORATED, LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE M FERNANDEZ, JR., FRANCIS CARBONNEAU, MARK JOHNSTON and others
In Re:
AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Ashley Jilek and LaTorrie Glover-Brown
Special Master:
HON. MARK FALK, USMJ (RET.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
PATLAN et al v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
as 2:2018cv09546
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL PATLAN, LA DELLA LEVY, RYAN CORNELL and others
Defendant:
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC and BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (BMW A.G.)
Not Classified By Court:
HON. DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH, RET.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREENWALD v. HOLSTEIN et al
as 2:2013cv06724
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GREENWALD
Defendant:
MARC HOLSTEIN, KEITH E. WHANN, PETER M. LEVY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAHANA et al v. SUN NATIONAL BANK et al
as 3:2007cv01976
Plaintiff:
ELLIOT MAHANA and JOY LEVY-MAHANA
Defendant:
SUN NATIONAL BANK and SOLOMON DWEK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
