Cases 1 - 7 of 7
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01279
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES, INC. , RESIDENTIAL CARE SERVICES, INC. and JAMES CASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARKER et al v. HOSTETTER et al
as 2:2013cv05081
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BARKER, KRISTEN BARKER, WILLIAM B. CAREY, III and others
Defendant:
WILMER L. HOSTETTER, JOYCE L. HOSTETTER, KEYSTONE CUSTOM HOMES, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
HUGH V ARCHER INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MAVICKAR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, MAVICKAR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC., MAVICKAR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TEMPAY, INC. v. CMK RESOURCE GROUP, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv06991
Plaintiff:
TEMPAY, INC.
Defendant:
CMK RESOURCE GROUP, LLC and FOCUS FIBER SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROCK et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31960
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. ROCK and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
STOUT STREET FUNDING LLC v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2010cv05634
Plaintiff:
STOUT STREET FUNDING LLC
Defendant:
OTIS JOHNSON, MABSTRACT, LLC, MABSTRACT MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBICHAW v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P. et al
as 2:2010cv03961
Plaintiff:
DAISEY M. ROBICHAW
Defendant:
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P. and EQUITY RESOURCES, INC.
Cross_claimant:
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.
Cross_defendant:
EQUITY RESOURCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
CAPITOL INSURANCE COMPANY v. DVORAK et al
as 2:2010cv01195
Plaintiff:
CAPITOL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CHARLES DVORAK, DOREEN DVORAK, ALISON DVORAK and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
