Cases 1 - 6 of 6
ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION et al v. GHAFARI ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 1:2023cv01884
Counter Defendant:
ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN GUARANTEE & LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
GHAFARI ASSOCIATES, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
PEPPER CONSTRUCTION CO. OF INDIANA, LLC, MILLER-EADS CO., ALBERS MANAGEMENT AND DESIGN SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION, et al v. GHAFARI ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 1:2023cv01872
Counter Defendant:
ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN GUARANTEE & LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Ghafari Associates, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Pepper Construction Co. of Indiana, LLC, Miller-Eads Co., ALBERS MANAGEMENT AND DESIGN SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MERIDIAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. EATON'S AUTO, INC.
as 3:2017cv00120
Defendant:
EATON'S AUTO, INC.
Plaintiff:
MERIDIAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
URBAHNS et al v. CENTURY PACIFIC SECURITIES, INC et al
as 1:2012cv01490
Defendant:
CENTURY PACIFIC SECURITIES, INC, ANTHONY CHANG and ASA WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
MERIDIAN ONE LLC and JOHN B URBAHNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PIERCE et al v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY et al
as 1:2007cv00153
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER PIERCE, JENNIFER PIERCE, MICHAEL PIERCE and others
Defendant:
AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY, AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
WALCZAK-DAEGE v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY et al
as 1:2007cv00154
Plaintiff:
TARA WALCZAK-DAEGE and TARA WALCZAK-DAEGE
Defendant:
AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY, AMERIQUET MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY NA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
