Cases 1 - 5 of 5
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al v. UBS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02953
Plaintiff:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA , PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , PRUDENTIAL RETIREMENT INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY and others
Defendant:
UBS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES, INC. , UBS SECURITIES LLC and MORTGAGE ASSET SECURITIZATION TRANSACTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
UBS Real Estate Securities Inc. v. Chomat et al
as 1:2008cv10164
Plaintiff:
UBS Real Estate Securities Inc., UBS Real Estate Securities Inc. and UBS Real Estate Securities Inc.
Defendant:
Hector Chomat and Elsa Chomat
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Barish Berger v. Eli Weinstein, et al
as 08-4011
Plaintiff:
BERISH BERGER
Defendant - Appellee:
PINE PROJECTS, ELI WEINSTEIN, RAVINDER S. CHAWLA and others
Defendant:
2040 MARKET ASSOC, UBS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES, INC and MARK SAHAYA, AKA Mark Stephens, DBA Mark Stephens Co
Defendant - Appellant:
JFK BLVD ACQUISITION
Barish Berger v. Eli Weinstein, et al
as 08-3851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERISH BERGER
Defendant - Appellee:
PINE PROJECTS, ELI WEINSTEIN, RAVINDER S. CHAWLA and others
Defendant:
UBS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES, INC and MARK SAHAYA, AKA Mark Stephens, DBA Mark Stephens Co
BERGER v. WEINSTEIN et al
as 2:2007cv00994
Plaintiff:
BERISH BERGER, BERISH BERGER and BERISH BERGER
Defendant:
ELI WEINSTEIN, ELI WEINSTEIN, ELI WEINSTEIN and others
Cross Claimant:
RAVINDER CHAWLA, WORLD ACQUISITION PARTNERS CORPORATION, WORLD ACQUISITION PARTNERS CORPORATION and others
Cross Defendant:
ELI WEINSTEIN, ELI WEINSTEIN, ELI WEINSTEIN and others
Counter Claimant:
2040 MARKET ASSOCIATES, LP, JFK BLVD ACQUISITION PARTNERS, L.P., ELI WEINSTEIN and others
Counter Defendant:
BERISH BERGER, BERISH BERGER, BERISH BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
