Cases 1 - 10 of 1,953
Laconi v. Ghosh
as 1:2025cv10107
Plaintiff:
Lance Laconi
Defendant:
Michael Ghosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Commerce Insurance Co. v. Zokop, LLC et al
as 4:2025cv10087
Defendant:
John Doe doing business as Etop Market, Zokop, LLC and eBay Inc.
Plaintiff:
Commerce Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Handsman et al v. Prayz et al
as 1:2025cv10078
Defendant:
Benjamin Prayz and Craig Dearr
Plaintiff:
Ivy Beth Handsman and Michael Micalizzi
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Commerce Insurance Co., a/s/o Doris and Paul Murphy v. Zokop, LLC et al
as 1:2025cv10087
Plaintiff:
Commerce Insurance Co., a/s/o Doris and Paul Murphy
Defendant:
Zokop, LLC and eBay Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Shen et al v. Zheng et al
as 3:2025cv30003
Defendant:
Law office of Edward Hung and Conghui Zheng
Plaintiff:
Hong Liang Shen, The Law Office of Katherine J Bierwas and Jie Tan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Martinez v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2025cv10060
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation, Auto Club Trust, FSB and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nicole Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
The Commerce Insurance Company A/S/O Robert Gay
as 1:2025cv10051
Defendant:
Hair U.S. Appliance Solutions Inc.
Plaintiff:
The Commerce Insurance Company A/S/O Robert Gay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howard v. Howard
as 1:2024cv13220
Defendant:
Warren K Howard
Plaintiff:
Stanley D. Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lomax v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et. al.
as 3:2024cv30162
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
Gareth Evan Lomax
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
