Cases 91 - 100 of 158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv05550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Jurkowski et al v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2015cv01155
Plaintiff:
J Frankie Jurkowski and Aaron Donny-Clark
Defendant:
City of Seattle, Steve Wilske, Chris Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis et al vs. Clark County Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv05449
Plaintiff:
Terry Ellis , Kaitlin Fairfax , Ronald Fuller and others
Defendant:
Clark County Department of Corrections, Clark County, Lisa Biffle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walsh et al v. Lucas et al
as 3:2015cv05440
Plaintiff:
Todd Walsh
Defendant:
Garry Lucas , Clark County , Devin Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burton v. Cowlitz County Board of Commissioners et al
as 3:2015cv05329
Plaintiff:
Lance W Burton
Defendant:
Cowlitz County Board of Commissioners, George Brader, Axel Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamache v. Bylsma et al
as 3:2015cv05154
Plaintiff:
Christine Gamache
Defendant:
Edward Bylsma, Robin Yakhour, Craig Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Armstrong v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2015cv05071
Plaintiff:
Clark R Armstrong
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Pierce County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2014cv06012
Defendant:
State of Washington , Maggie Miller-Stout , Wendy Stigall and others
Plaintiff:
Billie Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
