Cases 121 - 130 of 459
MILLS et al v. GOLDEN NUGGET ATLANTIC CITY, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv19610
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE J. MILLS, JUSTIN MILLS and DANIEL CHUN
Defendant:
K. KARPOLORICH, OFFICER DEVINE, OFFICER SMALLWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRECO v. GREWAL et al
as 3:2019cv19145
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 2-10, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, JARED M. MAPLES and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. GRECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv19031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv19855
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HENDERSON v. TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON et al
as 3:2019cv18656
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON (MERCER COUNTY), HAMILTON TOWNSHIP REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ESPOSITO et al v. RIDGEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 2:2019cv19030
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH ESPOSITO and VINCENT ESPOSITO
Defendant:
DANIEL FISHBEIN, RIDGEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION and LORNA OATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CAMPBELL v. THE STATE OF N.J. DEPT. OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY
as 1:2019cv19798
Defendant:
THE STATE OF N.J. DEPT. OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE T. CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2019cv18970
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE T. CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv19031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
v. XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-10 et al
as 3:2019cv18655
Defendant:
HAMILTON TOWNSHIP REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE, KELLY YAEDE, DANIEL SCHARFENBERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
