Cases 121 - 130 of 406
Jones v. United States Northern District Court of Georgia
as 1:2020cv04353
Defendant:
United States Northern District Court of Georgia
Plaintiff:
Deon D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04220
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jackson v. United States
as 1:2020cv04215
Defendant:
United States
Plaintiff:
Nadia Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The People of the State of California, United States of America, et. al. v. Abdel-Malak
as 4:2020cv00232
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California, United States of America, et. al.
Defendant:
Abanoob Abdel-Malak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jones v. United States Veterans Administration
as 1:2020cv03397
Defendant:
United States Veterans Administration
Plaintiff:
Deon D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shorty, Inc. v. The United States of America
as 1:2020cv03024
Plaintiff:
Shorty, Inc., Caprice Caprice and Norman B. Calvert
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose et al v. Raffensperger
as 1:2020cv02921
Plaintiff:
Brionte McCorkle, Richard Rose, James Major Woodall and others
Defendant:
Brad Raffensperger
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301 Denial or abridgement of right to vote on account of race or color
Abdel-Malak v. United States Marshall et al
as 4:2020cv00128
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, United States Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Abanoob Abdel-Malak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchanan v. AT & T
as 1:2020cv02229
Defendant:
Republic Service, Wilson Carolyn Family, United States Secret Service and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Buchanan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
