Cases 151 - 160 of 9,239
State of Oklahoma v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Taray Marquez Brown doing business as Ta'Ray Marquez Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Oklahoma State of v. Smith
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State of
Defendant:
Zackry Deon Smith Corp. Sole doing business as Zackry Deon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
State of Oklahoma v. Tapia
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Roy Tapia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Quintana v. Clinton W. Marrs, LTD et al
as 6:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Dr. Elias Quintana
Defendant:
Clinton W. Marrs, LTD, Ralph Fevig, Stephen P. Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Walden v. The City of Duncan, Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01075
Plaintiff:
Shawn Walden
Defendant:
The City of Duncan, Oklahoma and Christian Archer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Serpik v. Marsee et al
as 5:2023cv01030
Plaintiff:
Roman Vladimirovich Serpik
Defendant:
Angela C. Marsee, Gina Webb, Michelle K. Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
