Cases 171 - 180 of 1,943
CROSSON v. RODRIGUE
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY D CROSSON
Defendant:
JANINE RODRIGUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CROSSON v. KEATON
as 1:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY D CROSSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY KEATON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CROSSON v. WATERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY D CROSSON
Defendant:
WATERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SETH ROLFE, JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CROSSON v. MAINE STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY D CROSSON
Defendant:
MAINE STATE POLICE, ANNA LOVE, JOHN DOES and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CROSSON v. TOWN OF AUGUSTA et al
as 1:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY D CROSSON
Defendant:
TOWN OF AUGUSTA, EMPLOYEES AND STAFF OF G.A, OFFICER SIMON YORK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CROSSON et al v. OWNER OF PROPERTY TIM et al
as 2:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY D CROSSON
Defendant:
OWNER OF PROPERTY TIM and 76 LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CROSSON v. OBERT
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY D CROSSON
Defendant:
GORDON OBERT, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
DOYLE v. PORTER et al
as 2:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A DOYLE
Defendant:
JEFFREY PORTER, ANN MAKSYMOWICZ, CHARLES RUMMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHADBOURNE v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY DISTRICT COURT
as 2:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
HERBERT O CHADBOURNE, JR
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY DISTRICT COURT
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
