Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Chung v. PSRB Director
as 6:2014cv00952
Plaintiff:
Andy Chung
Defendant:
PSRB Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Chung v. P.S.R.B.
as 6:2014cv00156
Plaintiff:
Andy Chung
Psychiatric Security Review Board:
P.S.R.B.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Helgeson v. Tillamook et al
as 3:2013cv01222
Defendant:
Todd Anderson, Andy Long and County of Tillamook
Plaintiff:
Les Helgeson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chung v. Portland Police Bureau et al
as 3:2012cv01426
Plaintiff:
Andy Chung
Defendant:
Portland Police Bureau and Detective M.H. Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephens et al v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2012cv00171
Defendant:
Dr. Juile Andrews, John Barker, Rex Burkholder and others
Plaintiff:
Karellen Stephens, Qadira Stephens and Renee Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bettelyoun et al v. Espinoza et al
as 6:2008cv06063
Plaintiff:
Richard Leonard Bettelyoun and Kimberly Bettelyoun
Defendant:
Mike Espinoza, Cory Chase, Nathan Garibay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quick v. County of Jackson, Oregon et al
as 1:2007cv03063
Plaintiff:
David W. Quick
Defendant:
County of Jackson, Oregon, Korby Messer, Gary Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Overstreet-Smith v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2007cv00182
Plaintiff:
Mary Overstreet-Smith
Defendant:
City of Portland, Andy Griggs, Michael A. Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruecker v. Sommer et al
as 3:2007cv00089
Plaintiff:
Curtis Ruecker and Curtis Ruecker
Defendant:
Andy Sommer, Peter McDougal, Wilsonville High School and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
