Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Khalil v. Lee et al
as 2:2018cv04708
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Kenneth Heath, John Doe 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Adil Khalil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Heath v. D'Agostino & Associates, P.C. et al
as 1:2018cv03957
Defendant:
D'Agostino & Associates, P.C. and Lenora LaNier
Plaintiff:
George Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv03358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Heath v. Banks et al
as 1:2015cv04228
Defendant:
Stephen Banks, Alesia Brown, Director Be-Jena R. Dumas and others
Plaintiff:
George Heath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Heath v. Tsujihara et al
as 1:2015cv02154
Plaintiff:
George Heath
Defendant:
Kevin Tsujihara and State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heath v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv02963
Defendant:
Roger Bishop, John Does 1-6 and New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation
Plaintiff:
Hugh Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Heath v. Justices of Supreme Court, New York County et al
as 1:2013cv02419
Plaintiff:
George Heath
Defendant:
Justices of Appellate Division (1 Dept.), Justices of N.Y. State Court of Appeals, Justices of Supreme Court, New York County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heath v. Cortland Regional Medical Center
as 5:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
Alene Heath
Defendant:
Cortland Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
