Civil Rights Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Damali v. City of East Point, Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv00741
Plaintiff: Tanner Damali
Defendant: City of East Point, Georgia and Robert C. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00280
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Heard et al v. Deal et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff: Robert Heard
Defendant: Nathan Deal, Doug Collins, G.B.I. Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard et al v. Collins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00111
Plaintiff: Robert Heard
Defendant: Doug Collins, Nathan Deal, Casey Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. City of Waycross, Georgia et al
as 5:2014cv00031
Plaintiff: Andrew Poole
Defendant: City of Waycross, Georgia, Tony Tanner, Matthew Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King et al v. City of Waycross, Georgia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00032
Plaintiff: Darlene King , Latrice Cannady , Asia Moody and others
Defendant: City of Waycross, Georgia, Tony Tanner, Matthew Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00002
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv04450
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00506
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tanner Advertising Group, LLC v. City of Lawrenceville, Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv03695
Plaintiff: Tanner Advertising Group, LLC
Defendant: City of Lawrenceville, Georgia and Joshua M. Ferguson
Respondent: City of Lawrenceville Board of Zoning Appeals

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?