Cases 11 - 20 of 39
J.W., et al v. A.C. Roper, et al
as 12-15552
Plaintiff - Appellee:
J.W., G.S., P.S. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
A. C. ROPER, J. NEVITT, A. CLARK and others
J.W., et al v. A.C. Roper, et al
as 12-15551
Plaintiff - Appellee:
J.W., G.S., P.S. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY MOSS, A. C. ROPER, J. NEVITT and others
:
SERVICE
Smith v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2012cv03469
Plaintiff:
William Smith
Defendant:
City of Birmingham , A. C. Roper , Bryan Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Moore v. Miller et al
as 2:2012cv03434
Plaintiff:
Kevin Moore
Defendant:
Jeffery Miller, A C Roper, William Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliver et al v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2012cv01846
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Oliver and Glenda Harris
Defendant:
City of Birmingham , A C Roper and Ivor J Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edwards v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2012cv01813
Plaintiff:
Delores Edwards
Defendant:
City of Birmingham , A C Roper and John Boockholdt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2012cv01772
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Thompson
Defendant:
City of Birmingham , A C Roper , Terry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown et al v. City of Birmingham
as 2:2012cv00831
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Brown and Sylvia Brown
Defendant:
City of Birmingham , William Bell , A C Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edwards v. City of Birmingham et al
as 4:2012cv00766
Plaintiff:
Delores Edwards
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, A C Roper and John Roger Boockholdt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 4:2012cv00623
Plaintiff:
Willie Fannette Thompson
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of , A C Roper , Terry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
