Cases 11 - 20 of 91
Mower et al v. Nearman
as 2:2022cv00260
Petitioner:
Thomas W. Mower, Jr., Kathie L. Mower, Harmony Development and others
Respondent:
Nathan D. Nearman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Maese v. South Jordan City et al
as 2:2021cv00562
Plaintiff:
S. Steven Maese
Defendant:
South Jordan City, Johnny J. Serrano and Andrew E. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunson v. Adams et al
as 1:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Raland J. Brunson
Defendant:
Alma S. Adams, Pete Aguilar, Colin Z. Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brunson v. Adams et al
as 2:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Ben Sasse, David Scott, Lisa Murkowski and others
Plaintiff:
Loy Arlan Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00671
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens et al v. Schroeder
as 2:2020cv00510
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Stevens and Paula K. Stevens
Defendant:
Christopher Schroeder, Unified Police Department and Salt Lake City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peck et al v. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 2:2020cv00321
Defendant:
California, State of, Fiona Ma, Lou Correa and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Louis Peck and Jay Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bramhall v. Cyprus Credit Union et al
as 2:2019cv00477
Plaintiff:
Earle E. Bramhall and Earl E. Bramhall
Defendant:
Christina P. Ortega, Jared W. Rasband, Steven C. Gibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
