Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Nguyen et al v. Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology et al
as 3:2014cv00080
Defendant:
Celia Cangelosi, Frances Hand, Margaret Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Dinh Ho, Hanh Hoang, Hien Hoang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson et al v. Hebert et al
as 6:2013cv00909
Plaintiff:
Tony Gibson and Monica Gibson
Defendant:
Mark Hebert, David A Naquin, John Kahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mays v. Claiborne Parish et al
as 5:2013cv00603
Defendant:
Claiborne Parish, Claiborne Parish Detention Center, LaSalle Management Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May et al v. Strain et al
as 2:2013cv00176
Defendant:
Rodney Jack Strain, Jr, Mandeville City, Lindsey Scott Crain and others
Plaintiff:
Corina May and Joel Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv03127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Community Associated, Inc. v. New Orleans City et al
as 2:2012cv02030
Defendant:
New Orleans City, Pura Bascos, Paul May and others
Plaintiff:
Community Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv01803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
