Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Sudario v. Anhaiser, et al
as 4:2016cv00045
Plaintiff:
Joel Sudario
Defendant:
Charles Anhaiser, Clayton Bland, Bonnie Colzani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Blanton v. Newton Associates, Inc., a/k/a Richmond Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Pizza Hut
as 5:2012cv01103
Plaintiff:
Jamel Blanton
Defendant:
Newton Associates, Inc., a/k/a Richmond Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Pizza Hut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rogge et al v. The City Of Richmond, Texas et al
as 4:2011cv04201
Plaintiff:
Connie Rogge and Richard Rogge
Defendant:
The City Of Richmond, Texas , Todd Ganey and Danell Gaydos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor et al v. Richmond State Supported Living Center
as 4:2011cv03740
Defendant:
Richmond State Supported Living Center
Plaintiff:
Larry Paul Taylor and Pamela Lavelle Varnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mungia v. City of Richmond, Texas
as 4:2011cv00248
Plaintiff:
Ram Mungia
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mungia v. City of Richmond, Texas
as 3:2011cv00048
Plaintiff:
Ram Mungia
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMillan v. Richmond et al
as 3:2009cv01938
Plaintiff:
Billy Reese McMillan
Defendant:
Patrick Richmond and Natalie Jean Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
