Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Podems v. University of Alaska Anchorage
as 3:2016cv00194
Plaintiff:
Andrew Michael Podems
Defendant:
University of Alaska Anchorage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Polt v. Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
as 3:2014cv00226
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Polt
Defendant:
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Polt v. United States
as 3:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Polt
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Thomas v. State of Alaska District Attorneys Office Palmer AK et al
as 3:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
Andrew Victor Thomas
Defendant:
State of Alaska District Attorney's Office, Palmer, AK, Richard Allen, Trina Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. State of Alaska District Attorneys Office et al
as 3:2012cv00153
Plaintiff:
Andrew Victor Thomas
Defendant:
State of Alaska District Attorney's Office, Richard K. Allen, Beth Lewis Goldstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. District Attorneys Office Palmer AK. et al
as 3:2012cv00151
Plaintiff:
Andrew Victor Thomas
Defendant:
District Attorneys Office Palmer AK., Richard Allen, Trina Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Office of Public Advocacy et al
as 3:2012cv00152
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thomas
Defendant:
Office of Public Advocacy, Beth Trimmer, Krista Maciolek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polt v. The State of Alaska
as 3:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Polt
Defendant:
The State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
