Cases 11 - 20 of 20,253
OPAWL - Building AAPI Feminist Leadership et al v. Yost et al
as 2:2024cv03495
Plaintiff:
OPAWL - Building AAPI Feminist Leadership, Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, Elisa Bredendiek and others
Defendant:
Dave Yost and Frank LaRose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chester-Long v. Gabbard et al.
as 5:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
Raven Chester-Long
Defendant:
Police Chief John Gabbard and Garrett Marino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaines v. Cross et al
as 3:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Gaines
Defendant:
Denise Cross and Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaines v. Cross et al
as 1:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Gaines
Defendant:
Denise Cross and Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Redden v. Baird et al
as 1:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Michael Redden
Defendant:
Tim Baird and Ross Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv03422
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Anderson, M.D.
Defendant:
State of Ohio and Judge Timothy McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sawyer v. AAA Club Alliance Inc. et al.
as 3:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sawyer
Defendant:
AAA Club Alliance Inc. and Bradley Creese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
