Cases 11 - 20 of 185
Saxena v. Jackson et al
as 1:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Grant Mitchell Saxena
Defendant:
Gary M. Jackson, Melissa T. Annis, Zachary Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Gender)
Wolfe v. Calhoun
as 1:2022cv01935
Plaintiff:
Colton Wolfe
Defendant:
Daniel Calhoun, Daniel (I) Calhoun, Allen Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward (PS) v. Throne et al
as 1:2022cv01919
Plaintiff:
Fadia-Michelle Ward
Defendant:
Lorraine Throne, Victor Alexander, Don Kimble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith and Msahafer
Defendant:
Timothy Steve Smith, Trans Act Bank, Net Spend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrett v. Secretary General and the Secretariat of the United Nations, The et al
as 1:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Andrew Morton Garrett
Defendant:
Secretary General and the Secretariat of the United Nation, The, Liquidator and Managing Controller Appointed to the Crown, Queens Dominions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. US Bank
as 1:2021cv03470
Plaintiff:
Uniqua Webb
Defendant:
US Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. U.S Bank
as 1:2021cv03408
Plaintiff:
Uniqua Webb
Defendant:
U.S Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
McRae v. JPMorgan Chase & Co
as 1:2021cv01706
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co, Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N
Plaintiff:
Sylvia McRae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
