Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Aery v. Nuckolls, et al
as 16-5176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHLEY AERY
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD NUCKOLLS, in his individual capacity, STANLEY GLANZ, in his individual capacity, VIC REGALADO, in his official capacity as Tulsa County Sheriff and others
Trimble v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2016cv00263
Plaintiff:
Tom D Trimble
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Oklahoma , Karen Keith and Ron Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Glanz et al
as 4:2016cv00154
Plaintiff:
Dakota Randolph
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz , Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County , Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birdwell v. Glanz et al
as 4:2015cv00304
Plaintiff:
Scott W Birdwell
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz, Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Unknown Nurse #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
King v. Hill
as 14-5073
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONALD FRANCIS KING
Defendant - Appellant:
LAMONT HILL
Defendant:
TULSA COUNTY SHERIFF 'S DEPARTMENT, STANLEY GLANZ, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Tulsa County, ALLEN GOODSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McKeever v. Glanz et al
as 4:2013cv00112
Plaintiff:
William McKeever
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz , Tulsa County Sheriff's Office , Correctional Healthcare Management of Oklahoma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
