Cases 11 - 20 of 23
BREWER v. WRAY et al
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRUDUP et al v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2020cv01135
Plaintiff:
DAVID BURNS, DONTREY BELL and DALONTA CRUDUP
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWYERS UNITED INC. et al v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2019cv03222
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., AMIT P MEHTA, JON S TIGAR and others
Not Classified By Court:
JEFFREY S WHITE, RU D MOSS and EVELY AIMEE DE JESUS
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS UNITED INC, LAWYERS UNITED INC. and EVELYN AIMEE DE JESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00739
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LEOTIE v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01521
Defendant:
RUBIN LUBIN, OCWEN MORTGAGE, NATURES POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
ABYOKE LEOTIE and KEISHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2017cv00578
Plaintiff:
THOMASINA BURNS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
BURNS v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL/CHASE BANK
as 1:2014cv00431
Plaintiff:
GINNY RENE BURNS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON MUTUAL/CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
STATE OF TEXAS v. HOLDER
as 1:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Movant:
ERIC KENNIE , ANNA BURNS , MICHAEL MONTEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
