Cases 11 - 20 of 126
FLORENDO-ONG v. IL-USA et al
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN FLORENDO-ONG
Defendant:
116th/117th US CONGRESSIONAL 535 MEMBERS, 177 MEMBERS IL G.A., CECILIA ABUNDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BREWER v. WRAY et al
as 1:2022cv00996
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ADAMS v. CITY OF HARRISON, ARKANSAS et al
as 1:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF HARRISON, ARKANSAS, JERRY JACKSON, BURR ROBERTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BREWER v. WRAY et al
as 1:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BREWER v. WRAY et al
as 1:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. NELSON et al
as 1:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
BRETT-ANDREW NELSON
Defendant:
DONALD CORWIN JACKSON, LORI BETH TALBOT, ASHKEY MORGAN BURGEMEISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUSHING vs. CITY OF BARLOW
as 1:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
SHAUN RUSHING
Defendant:
CITY OF BARLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOPEZ v. CITY OF SANTA ANA et al
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL LOPEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF SANTA ANA, CITY OF SANTA ANA POLICE DEPARTMENT, A. NQUYEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BREWER v. WRAY et al
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
