Cases 11 - 20 of 450
Walker et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Terrence Walker and Amber Bishop
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, City of Harrodsburg, Kentucky and J.D. Pal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lillacalenia v. City of Louisville
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
City of Louisville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lillacalenia v. City of Louisville
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
City of Louisville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farrow v. Vanceburg
as 0:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Janet Farrow
Defendant:
City of Vanceburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Pate v. City of Georgetown Kentucky et al
as 5:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Whitney Pate
Defendant:
City of Georgetown Kentucky, Georgetown Police Department and Officer Aaron Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forte v. City of Hopkinsville et al
as 5:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Forte et al
Defendant:
City of Hopkinsville and Christian County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forte v. City of Hopkinsville, et al
as 5:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Joe Forte
Defendant:
City of Hopkinsville, The Hopkinsville Police Dept and B. ODonnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Forte v. City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky et al
as 5:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Joe Forte
Defendant:
City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky and Hopkinsville Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
