Cases 11 - 20 of 45
FRAZIER v. THE CITY OF PHILA
as 2:2018cv00827
Plaintiff:
MARK S. FRAZIER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON et al v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2017cv05696
Plaintiff:
MAMIE LAWSON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, BUREAU ADMIN. ADJUDICATION, RICHARD DICKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATER v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2017cv03203
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, CITY OF PHILA LICENSE AND INSPECTION COMMISSIONER, JOHN MANDROS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARLEY v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00904
Plaintiff:
MARY HARLEY
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ENTIRE CITY COUNCIL STAFF, JANIE BLACKWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEADEN v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2017cv00498
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GLENN HEADEN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA. and DETENTION CENTER STATE ROAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPEARMAN v. CITY OF PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM, CFCF et al
as 2:2016cv05268
Plaintiff:
MELVIN SPEARMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM, CFCF, RASOL HINTON, C. EAGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY et al v. CITY OF PHILA.-WATER DEPT.
as 2:2016cv02963
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KELLY, JR. and DONALD S. SABATINI
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA.-WATER DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRAZIER v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2015cv06878
Plaintiff:
MARK S. FRAZIER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA and COMMONWEALTH OF PENN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2015cv04142
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DEREK HILL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, FREE LIBRARY OF PHILA and PARKWAY CENTRAL LIBRARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EL v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2015cv04038
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL MILLER EL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA and CITY OF PHILA POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
