Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HARMON et al v. BOROUGH OF BELMAR et al
as 3:2017cv02437
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY HARMON , MATTHEW HARMON , DCJ BELMAR, INC and others
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF BELMAR, MATTHEW DOHERTY, COLLEEN CONNOLLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARTFELDER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 3:2016cv05461
Plaintiff:
DAWN HARTFELDER
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, JOSEPH R. FUENTES, GEOFFREY L. CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
SHAW v. BURLINGTON COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2011cv07056
Plaintiff:
ERNEST R. SHAW
Defendant:
BURLINGTON COUNTY CORRECTIONS, RONALD COX, BARNWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SZCZPANIAK v. BURLINGTON COUNTY et al
as 1:2010cv00199
Plaintiff:
CONRAD SZCZPANIAK, CONRAD SZCZPANIAK and CONRAD SZCZPANIAK
Defendant:
BURLINGTON COUNTY, BURLINGTON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and RONALD COX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURNS v. COLE et al
as 1:2009cv02794
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. BURNS
Defendant:
JUEL E. COLE, COX, BURLINGTON COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
COX et al v. TOWNSHIP OF EDISON et al
as 2:2007cv01993
Plaintiff:
KYLE COX and ISAIAH MCKOY
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, SHAWN MEADE, EDISON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
