Cases 11 - 20 of 340
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15915
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Douglas et al v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2023cv02820
Plaintiff:
Giovante Douglas and Cartier Hunter
Defendant:
City of Oakland and Phong Tran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
DeFigh v. City of Oakland
as 3:2023cv02009
Plaintiff:
Jared DeFigh
Defendant:
City of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blalock et al v. Oakland Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv01999
Plaintiff:
Jessica Blalock, Lydia Blumberg, Lisa Gray-Garcia and others
Defendant:
Oakland Police Department, Burch, Latonda Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blu et al v. City Of Oakland et al
as 3:2023cv01655
Plaintiff:
Sancreasa Blu and A. A.
Defendant:
City Of Oakland and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jorge Rodriguez v. City Of Oakland et al
as 3:2023cv01493
Plaintiff:
jorge rodriguez
Defendant:
City Of Oakland and Oakland Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
v. City Of Oakland et al
as 3:2023cv01486
Defendant:
City Of Oakland and Oakland Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Theo Jones v. City of Oakland
as 23-15340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEO CEDAR JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OAKLAND
Estate of Decedent Lolomania Soakai et al v. City of Oakland
as 3:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Estate of Decedent Lolomania Soakai, Lavinia Soakai, Daniel Fifita and others
Defendant:
City of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
