Cases 11 - 20 of 26
(PS) Devore v. CDCR, et al.,
as 2:2018cv02487
Defendant:
BINJ Laboratories, Eugene Tu, Michael Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Devore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014at00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014at00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Receiver:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014at00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Receiver:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Michael Henry v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. et al
as 2:2014cv02823
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, P.D. Brazelton, Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry
Melvin Wishum et al v. State of California et al
as 3:2014cv01491
Plaintiff:
Melvin Wishum and Chrystal Tyler
Defendant:
State of California , Edmund G. Brown, Jr. , Corrections and Rehabilitation CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014at00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Melvin Wishum et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2013cv06255
Defendant:
P D Brazelton, Edmund G Brown, Jr, California Correctional Health Care Services and others
Plaintiff:
Chrystal Tyler and Melvin Wishum
Jackson et al v. State of California et al
as 1:2013at00457
Plaintiff:
Arthur Duane Jackson , LEONARD M LUJAN , MARCUS JACKSON and others
Defendant:
State of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
