Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Imani et al v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2017cv00439
Defendant:
Melvin Lee Holden, City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Plaintiff:
Blair Imani, Akeem Muhammad, Raae Pollard and others
Interested Party:
James W Craig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sanchez v. City of Bossier City et al
as 5:2016cv00479
Defendant:
City of Bossier City, Jeremy Nelson, Kevin Wooten and others
Petitioner:
Eusebio Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12201
Everson v. Bunch et al
as 3:2014cv00583
Defendant:
Talmadge Bunch, Curtis Fremin, Jr. and Gerald Starks
Plaintiff:
Troy Everson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirchberg et al v. City of Alexandria et al
as 1:2013cv02552
Plaintiff:
Curtis D Kirchberg and Kristina Kirchberg
Defendant:
City of Pineville, Donald Weatherford, City of Alexandria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Phan et al
as 5:2013cv02333
Defendant:
Hai Phan , City of Shreveport and Police Dept of Shreveport
Plaintiff:
Amber Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. New Orleans City et al
as 2:2012cv02017
Plaintiff:
Consulleo Anderson
Defendant:
New Orleans City, Ronal Serpas, Kevin Doucette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddis et al v. Martin et al
as 2:2012cv01221
Plaintiff:
Todd Gaddis , Twana Fletcher and Dawn Maurer
Defendant:
Josh Martin and Janet Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
