Cases 11 - 19 of 19
William Tezak et al v. Geoffrey T Glass et al
as 8:2013cv01566
Defendant:
Regina Alcantera, Charles Bagby, David H Brickner and others
Plaintiff:
William Tezak
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Timothy Lewis Whiting v. Stan Henry et al
as 5:2011cv00552
Defendant:
Adams, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Agua Caliente Casino Resort Spa and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lewis Whiting
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03403
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Fobbs et al v. New Haven Unified School District et al
as 4:2010cv01065
Plaintiff:
Alvett Fobbs , Teola Coleman , Auzalea Godfrey and others
Defendant:
New Haven Unified School District , Pat Jaurequi , Don Montoya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fobbs et al v. New Haven Unified School District et al
as 3:2010cv01065
Plaintiff:
Alvett Fobbs , Teola Coleman , Auzalea Godfrey and others
Defendant:
New Haven Unified School District , Pat Jaurequi , Don Montoya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03192
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Goodspeed et al v. Passenheim et al
as 3:2009cv01642
Plaintiff:
Tony Eugene Goodspeed, II and PJ Stewart
Defendant:
Brian Passenheim, Stephen G. Becor, Michael E. Cholerton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jack Graham v. American Golf Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv04794
Plaintiff:
Jack W. Graham
Defendant:
American Golf Corporation, American Golf Corporation, National Golf Operating Partnership, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
